top of page

ROBERTSON LITIGATION

(Law Offices of Clayton T. Robertson)

Search

Law Enforcement's Failure to Investigate

  • Writer: Clayton T. Robertson
    Clayton T. Robertson
  • Nov 10, 2021
  • 1 min read

By Clayton T. Robertson (Criminal Defense / Civil Litigation Attorney)


Law enforcement's failure to adequately investigate an alleged crime can be used effectively at trial as part of a reasonable doubt defense.


This constitutes one of my favorite themes: Prosecute the prosecution.


In other words, turn the trial around on them -- use "law and order" themes against the prosecution (and, in the process, appeal to those juror types) by showing breaches of their values (e.g., apprehending the guilty, following and playing by the rules, doing the right thing, protecting society, etc.).


Civil attorneys likewise do this through a technique called "negative spacing" -- i.e., examining everything that was NOT done (by an expert, deponent, etc.) and focusing the jury's attention on those issues. This same technique can be used in criminal cases and trials.


In both a civil litigation and criminal defense setting, this is not a red herring strategy. In fact, it's a credible way to show how what was not done affects the credibility and reliability of the results.


Finally, in any given case, this strategy may be buttressed by experts who testify about the consequences of "confirmation bias" and how law enforcement collects only just enough data points to land on an initial target/suspect without a thorough exploration of innocence or evaluating other suspects.





 
 

Disclaimer

This website is legal advertising. I am licensed as an attorney in the State of California (SBN 229430). The information you obtain at this site -- including the blog -- is not, nor is it intended to be, legal advice, nor does it form an attorney-client relationship. Case results are not guaranteed and results described on this site are not necessarily representative of ultimate case outcomes. Each case is different. Specifically, any client testimonials do not constitute a guarantee or prediction of results. You should consult an attorney for advice regarding your individual situation. We invite you to contact us and welcome your calls, emails, chats, texts, contact forms, letters, or other communications. Contacting us does not create an attorney-client relationship. Please do not send confidential information to us until such time as an attorney-client relationship has been established. Past results are case/client-specific and do not guarantee future results. Each case must be evaluated on its own merits. If at any point you have questions, please feel free to contact us at ctr@robertsonlitigation.com or at the number listed above.

© 2025 by RobertsonLitigation.com (Law Offices of Clayton T. Robertson)

bottom of page